A growing presence
Extensive narrative content in annual reports
• Chairman’s
statement
• Directors’
report
• Auditor’s
report
• Statement
of corporate governance
• Strategic
report (business review)
Plus more or less whatever else you wish
Most narrative content is not subject to audit
Although informally auditors might review
Much narrative =
voluntary disclosures
As opposed to a
mandatory requirement
• if
voluntary – can always omit
• more
significantly – disclose what you wish
Appearing to say a lot but actually very little
The Corporate Report
A key milestone in development of UK reporting
Published by ASSC in 1975
Provides underpinnings of corporate reporting
And in retrospect the case for narratives
Several alternative statements identified
• value
added statement
• money
exchanges with government
• transactions
in foreign currency
• employment
report
Employment reporting
Provision of information on employment issues
Most specifically about employees
• human
resource accounting
• beyond
‘putting people on the balance sheet’
These were more enlightened times
• corporatism
– the new capitalism?
Alternatively employee reports
A wide range of possible content
• age
and gender profile of employees
• workforce
size and distribution by type of jobs
• geographical
distribution
• employee
turnover
• training
and development expenditure
• skills/competence
profiles
• health
and safety performance
• sickness
absence/health and wellbeing
Operating and
financial review
A major UK innovation in narrative reporting
Introduced in 1993 as a voluntary disclosure
Prospective information not historical
Opportunities for using non financial measures
Two elements were identified
• operating
review – discussion of performance
• financial
review – financial management
Valuable additional information for investors
Proposal to make mandatory from 2006
With an extended content
Was abandoned in November 2005
A Business Review requirement introduced
Coalition Govt proposed OFR reintroduction
Evolved into Strategic Report requirement
Once again a very open ended document
Now quietly being abandoned by government?
Management Discussion
and Analysis
The US counterpart to the OFR
Introduced by FASB in 1999
MD&A should
provide a clear and concise
description of
the reporting entity and its
mission,
activities, program and financial
performance,
systems, controls, legal
compliance,
financial position, and financial
condition [in
a balanced fashion].
Management commentary
The 2010 IASB requirement on such disclosure
Identified in an IFRS Practice Statement
Does not have standing of an IFRS
So it is a mandatory requirement not voluntary
But again detailed compliance not demanded
• acknowledge
the practice statement
• required
to follow ‘principles’ not ‘rules’
Corporate social
reporting
The practical complement to social accounting
• accounting
to society
Has evolved into two complementary emphases
• environmental/sustainability
accounting
• business/corporate
ethics
A predictable ambivalence from business
And a site for developing narrative reporting
United Nations Global
Compact
Identifies 10 universally accepted principles
• on
human rights (2)
• on
labour (4)
• on
the environment (3)
• on
anti-corruption (1)
ISO26000 complements this statement
Provides guidance on reporting principles
Global Reporting
Initiative
The most mature initiative in CSR space
Dates back to late 1990s, with UN links
The provision of guidance for reporting
Focus is on environmental/sustainability issues
Aims to make sustainability reporting routine
Has adopted a corporate approach to challenge
4000+ organisations have signed up
Has embraced the Triple Bottom Line model
• economic
- profit
• social
- people
• environmental
– planet
None is to be accorded primacy
More recently a 4th bottom line – governance
Beginning to look a little familiar?
Social audit
The complementary accounting intervention
Provide assurance of CSR activity
First social audits predate current initiatives
• independent
scrutiny of annual reports
• often
politically motivated
Accounting firms have moved into the space
• provide
legitimacy and credibility
Danish Guideline
Project
An alternative approach to IC reporting
Heavily reliant on narratives
Funded by Danish government 1998-2002
A two phase intervention
• initial
work with 17 companies
• broader
project with 100 companies
The principal output was a reporting framework
• intellectual
capital statement
Meritum project pursued in parallel
Intellectual capital
statement
A four element generic framework
• knowledge
narrative
• management
challenges
• initiatives
• report
– similar to the second iteration BS
Various ideas on the status of the ICS
At the extreme – replace annual reports
The ICS: 2003 – 2013
A review of the fate of the ICS over a decade
• modest
success – only a minority persevered
• accountants
rarely took ownership
• success
was normally robustly championed
• ‘people’
was the most enduring focus
• certainly
not a waste of resources
The downfall: not made a mandatory disclosure
Self-accounting
narratives
“Imprisoning people in other people’s accounts”
Empower human capital to produce narratives
• work
experiences
• intellectual
development
• organisational
culture
• health
and wellbeing
Complemented by customer self-accounts
No comments:
Post a Comment