This research proposal contains
literature review and proposed methodology for anticipated research. The
research will seek to establish two dimensions of higher tourism education: how
location of related institutions is connected to tourism’s importance in the
economy; and how higher tourism education contributes to wealth creation. The
rationale for the study is based on the fact that little has been done in
literature to link the areas of study as clearly as proposed in this research.
The research shall make use of primary research using interviews which will be
done on higher education practitioners. The sample size shall be 50 (from which
20 will be analysed) and the sampling approach shall be judgemental. Emphasis
shall be on interviewing providers of higher tourism education with emphasis on
policy makers. This is because they are likely to be aware of the reasons why
the specific field of study should be considered as important to the economy.
They would also be aware of concentration of similar institutions in other
markets.
It is difficult to determine which
between globalisation and education helps more in wealth creation.
Globalisation promotes movement around the world and in case of tourism; it
makes tourism destinations very accessible. Higher education on the other hand
promotes wealth creation in the tourism sector by promoting creativity and
entrepreneurship in the sector. The aim of this research is to try and
establish if higher tourism education (HTE) can help create wealth. It also
evaluates the business concept of supply and demand in relation to whether the
concentration of HTE institutions is dependent on how important tourism is
considered in an economy. This is in addition to its ability to make its
students better entrepreneurs in the field of tourism by enabling them
understand the concept of tourism (Galal, 2011). Higher tourism education is
training programs aimed at equipping students to master the concept of tourism
and service delivery. It ranges from vocational training to regular education
programs that are taken in the university programs. Higher education is an
important tool for multiplying wealth.
Those who are equipped with knowledge in
tourism are able to ensure that tourists are served well. They are able to
understand the tourists and know how to offer satisfaction to them. They are
also able to know how to manage their tourism products to get the greatest
yield. The trained tourism professionals also tend to be good at marketing and
attracting tourists to their destinations (Jamrozy, 2007). The growth of
tourism can be attributed to several factors including globalisation and its
influence on the movement of people across countries. Globalisation also
facilitates cross cultural communication as there is increased understanding
between people. In my opinion, even though wealth creation in tourism is not
only because of higher education, HTE does contribute significantly to wealth
creation.
The bulk of studies on higher tourism
education do not make an attempt to establish the connection between the
concentration of higher tourism education institutions and the importance of
tourism in the economy. The assumption that the institutions are more in
countries that value tourism more is questionable and in need have research.
The same applies to the relationship between HTE and wealth creation. Studies
are many on the performance of tourism in different economies and it is
therefore easy to tell that tourism does have an impact on the wealth of the
countries. However, there is little connection made between higher tourism
education and wealth creation.
In general, the location of any
organisation or enterprise depends on demand. An organisation is more likely to
set up operations in places where the demand is high. In relation to tourism,
higher tourism education programs are likely to be located in regions where the
industry is considered as very important (Cubillo, Sanchez and Cervino, 2006).
The demand for the educational programs is influenced by the thoughts of the
market on the related field. This means that tourism education enjoys high
demand only in countries or regions where tourism is considered to be very
important. The level of importance on the other hand is determined by the
ability of people to see opportunities and be determined to exploit them.
In my view the relationship between
higher education and wealth creation is not in dispute. Tourism is an industry
that mainly depends on human resources and making them more skilled can help
the industry grow. The endogenous growth theory is used to explain the
relationship between economic performance and education. The theory considers
knowledge as a form of human capital. This capital can be exploited to fuel
discoveries, create new industries or sectors within an industry, and promote
growth (Bhat and Gaur, 2012). From the presentation above, the performance of
tourism in Europe may not be directly linked to how important the industry is to
the economy. However, there are general observations that link the level of
education in an economy and their ability to excel in offering services.
Tourism is a service which needs to be offered with tact and strategy for the
tourists to be satisfied. Understanding tourism and understanding the tourists
is very important as a component of this.
In addition to understanding the
tourists, the practitioners need to understand their resources. Resources can
be used to create different effects. This is a function of education where
people are trained to be very creative in how they perceive the resources
around them (Cepar and Bojnec, 2010). Apart from having natural sceneries that
tourists would like to see, the rest of the tourism destinations are a product
of creativity. Superior architecture promotes tourism. Provision of excellent
accommodation and holiday experiences also promote tourism. Culture can also be
showcased in a manner that promotes understanding hence also promoting tourism.
In the end, the tourists can be attracted through diverse means to visit a
country and the knowledge of doing that.
The influence of higher tourism
education on wealth creation is dependent on the manner in which it is applied
and the manner in which the students put their knowledge into action. It is
important to appreciate that knowledge is human capital (Gouna, 2009). This is
just one of the forms of capital that are needed for wealth creation. Other
forms must be present for the higher tourism education to produce the desired
effect of wealth creation. For instance, having a pool of trained tourism
industry practitioners does not yield much fruit unless investors are willing
to fund their initiatives. Governments should also be proactive in promoting
tourism. One of the ways in which government promote tourism is by advertising
the country over international media. Such advertisements benefit the industry
as a whole.
The other way in which governments
promote wealth creation through tourism is by maintaining political stability
and national security. Tourists only prefer to visit locations where they are
sure of their personal safety as well as the safety of their belongings
(Diplari and Dimou, 2010). Besides, tourists also value infrastructure. Most
tourists would like to visit locations that have the necessary infrastructure
so that they can enjoy their vacations. Facilities such as modern hotels and
roads are crucial for tourism. It is government and not the practitioners that
play a major role in facilitating development of such infrastructure. The only
exception are the few tourists that seem to prefer nature based tourism and
would therefore not mind rugged and traditional settings during their vacations
(Kaynak and Ali, 2012). A review of these factors points to the fact that
education, as human capital, is only a component of wealth creation in the
tourism industry. It is however an important component.
Higher tourism education contributes to
wealth creation in a number of ways. As has been mentioned before, education
promotes understanding across cultures. It enables the tour practitioners to
behave in a manner that is acceptable or even preferred by the international
tourists (Chang and Hsu, 2010). This understanding enables them provide good
service and enhance customer satisfaction. It is these satisfaction levels that
play the most important role in promoting sustainable tourism as tourists
recommend the destinations to others who may be interested in doing so in the
future.
Higher education tourism also covers
areas such as sustainability which are very important in ensuring that
performance in tourism is sustainable. Sustainability can be discussed on two
levels. Firstly, environmental sustainability is crucial in ensuring that
tourism is sustained into the future (Busby and Gibson, 2010). With good
education, ways of ensuring that natural resources are not exhausted can be
created. The second factor is societal sustainability for the host communities.
This is especially applicable in the rural poor and delicate environments such
as the Polar Regions (Dipari and Dimou, 2010). Tourism provides the best source
of employment in such areas since other forms of development are not allowed.
Most governments disallow economic activities in regions that they consider
delicate and only tourism can be used to generate funds without negatively
affecting such areas. In addition to sustainability, education promotes
creativity.
These presentations indicate that there
is indeed a link between higher tourism education and wealth creation. But it
is difficult to determine which of the two factors is dependent on the other.
The confusion can be explained by the following two arguments. Firstly, it can
be said that tourism education has led to creativity, tourist attraction and
increased spending per tourist (Bhat and Gaur, 2012). This has led to wealth
creation. The second argument could be: being that the country is wealthy, it
is able to invest more in higher tourism education and establishing numerous
institutions to do that (Bhat and Gaur, 2012). The merits of each of the
statements are worth considering. Even where it may be true that higher tourism
education helps in improving wealth, it may be difficult to prove it. This is
because national wealth is dependent on many more factors including government
policies and the state of the world economy.
The objections to the theory can however
be overruled using observations and facts. For instance, in countries where higher
tourism education is advanced, there seems to be greater creativity in the
manner in which tourists are handled. In developed countries such as Britain
and France, it is easy for one to find a complete consumer guide online and
make bookings to all sites and accommodations they intend to use in the course
of their visit. They are also able to transact from across the border. The
level of service also tends to be comparatively high. In some of the cases,
money is made by the industry in less obvious ways. For instance, a visit to
some sites can be free. This encourages tourists to visit more sites and the
economy gains when they spend on additional items such as food, clothes, gift
items and hotel accommodation.
In addition to creativity, education helps
the tourism practitioners overcome language barriers. Languages such as English
and French are common languages of instruction in institutions around the world
(Kaynak and Ali, 2012). Overcoming language barriers is crucial in attracting
tourists. Most tourists would avoid destinations where they would not be in a
position to communicate effectively. Understanding language and other cultural
dimensions is important for wealth creation in the tourism industry.
In conclusion, even though it is
difficult to distinguish between globalisation and education as factors
promoting tourism, the link to the distribution of HTE institutions has
received less attention. This research will attempt to seal literature gaps in
establishing whether distribution of HTE institutions influences the level of
wealth.
This research shall use an inductive
approach as the basis for making its findings. General observations and
responses gathered in the course of the research shall be the basis for drawing
conclusions.
The philosophy to be used shall be
realism. In realism, the researcher acknowledges both subjective and objective
angles to research (Bryman and Bell, 2007). The subjective views are those that
are formed from the personal experiences of the sources of information. In this
case, it is expected for the target interviewees to be in favour of HTE hence
may tend to emphasise more on its importance on wealth creation in tourism.
However, the core of the study will be on the impact on distribution hence the
biases are not likely to have a great impact. Besides, the research shall be
conducted in a manner that helps in eliminating the biases.
The research shall use both secondary
and primary sources. Secondary sources shall be used to create a theoretical
basis for the same. However, as has been observed in the literature review
above, there is a literature gap. Studies that link the distribution of HTE
institutions to wealth creation in tourism are quite rare. This means that
secondary research will only serve the purpose of providing a basis for how
education and globalisation can influence wealth creation. The specific link
between distribution of HTE institutions and wealth creation shall be sought
using secondary research.
Primary research shall be done using
interviews. With interviews, the research and the interviewee have an open
discussion on the subject matter (Collis and Hussey, 2003). The responses are
either recorded or transcribed for further analysis. The reason for choosing
the interview approach was because it facilitates open discussions. It also
provides an opportunity for instant clarifications whenever there is a
misunderstanding (Collis and Hussey, 2003). This advantage is important to this
research since it attempts to investigate a matter that has rarely been
investigated before. The interviewees may therefore need elaborations and
explanations before they can comment on the matter. The main disadvantage of
interviews is that they tend to lean towards the areas of bias of the
interviewees. They tend to dwell more on areas they understand well at the
expense of the areas where their understanding is low. In this research, this
weakness shall be dealt with by allocating timelines for each question to
ensure they are all given attention.
The population shall be higher education
providers in the field of tourism. These will mostly the professors and senior
administrators in institutions that provide higher tourism education. The
choice of this population is informed by the fact that this is their field of
study. They are therefore likely to be very aware of the impact that their
services create both in the industry and the economy. The assumption made in
this case is that these professors must have sought to interrogate the question
of value of their programs and they are likely to have done preliminary
research on the area. It is expected that their participation will be
influenced by their need to find out whether their views are shared or
contradicted across the industry. This means that they are likely to request
for copies of the research report; which I will provide to them.
Sampling shall be judgemental and shall
be based on considerations of availability and perceived knowledge in the
matter. Information on the professors targeted shall be obtained online and
through phone calls after which interviews shall be scheduled in consultation
with the professors. A sample size of 50 shall be settled on.
Given that the sample size is large for
an interview, and due to the fact that they are widely distributed, it will be
difficult to meet them on one-on-one interviews. Where it will be possible to
meet about 5 interviewees at the same time, the interviews will be converted
into discussion sessions where the interviewees benefit from each other’s’
thoughts before giving theirs. This approach will be useful in eliminating
individual biases. 3 discussion groups shall be formed for this purpose. This
differs from the approach of focus groups as selection will be random with the
only consideration being availability and not specific professional or
experience backgrounds. The rest of the interviewees shall be interviewed via the
internet using video chat applications. This approach shall be useful in
reducing the cost of the research and also in promoting convenience as the
interviewees can participate even from home. The disadvantage of this approach
is that it does not promote quality of communication. Communication is more
effective when there is physical presence. However, it is the best choice
available that can produce acceptable results.
This is qualitative research. It means
that it repeat information may not add much value. The interview results shall
therefore be sifted to try and find where additional knowledge or unique
approach to the knowledge is provided. The group discussion results shall be
prioritised due to their ability to eliminate biases. The rest of the
interviews shall be sifted for any additional information. It is anticipated
that by the time the 20th interview is considered, the findings will
have already been exhausted. The analysis shall therefore factor in 20 out of
the 50 interviews. An indication of proposed questions for the research are
shown in Appendix 1.
Challenges are expected in being able to
convince interviewees to create time for research. The target interviewees are
quite busy and getting them into an interview may be very difficult. This
challenge shall be overcome by making appointments in advance and facilitating
discussions that do not involve much distraction. For instance, conducting an
online interview is easier to schedule as the interviewee does not have to
allocate time within their busy working hours. Secondly, it is expected that
the professors will be curious about the subject matter and would be willing to
participate as a way to guarantee that they will receive a copy of the report.
These areas of study have received very
little attention in the past. Little effort has been made to directly link
education to wealth creation and even fewer links exist to link concentration
of higher tourism education institutes and importance of tourism in the
economy. This will be a new study that will be expected to raise important
questions. Where information that is relevant to research is not available, it
shall be adopted as part of recommendations for future research.
This research proposes
to create an understanding of how education is related to wealth creation.
Specific focus shall be on higher tourism education and how it leads to wealth
creation in relation to tourism. In this study, it will be acknowledged that other
factors such as globalisation and government policy are very crucial in
tourism. It recognises that the bulk of studies have been on globalisation and
how the same leads to success in the tourism industry. The little attention
provided on linking education to success in tourism has concentrated on the
core of skills creation. However, there has been little connection between the
distribution of HTE institutions and tourism. It is expected that studies on
tourism will be most common in areas where tourism is excelling. However, it is
also expected that the influence of globalisation in the movement of students
will bring in a new angle where having institutions in a certain location does
not necessarily mean that only locals are able to access their services. The
emergence of new learning techniques such as online and distance learning is
expected to feature in this study. Lack of relevant information shall be
included in recommendations for future research.
Bibliography
Bibliography
Alderman, D.H., Benjamin, S.K and Schneider, P.P
(2012), Transforming Mount Airy into Mayberry: Film-Induced Tourism as
Place-Making, Southeastern Geographer,
52(2), pp. 212-239
Bhat, S and Gaur, S.S (2012), Managing diverse
stakeholders in the context of destination marketing, Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 4(2), pp. 185-202
Black, G.S (2010), A Social Marketing Approach for
De-Marketing Sex Tourism, The Business
Review, Cambridge, 15(2), pp. 33-41
Bryman, A. & Bell, E. (2007). Business Research Methods. 2nd edition.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
Busby, G.D and Gibson, P (2010), Tourism and
hospitality internship experiences overseas: A British perspective, Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sports and
Tourism Education, 9(1), pp. 4-12
Cepar, Z. and Bojnec, S (2010), Higher Education
Demand Factors and the Demand for Tourism Education in Slovenia, Organizacija, 43(6), p. 257
Chang, T. & Hsu, J (2010), Man Development
framework for tourism and hospitality in higher vocational education in Taiwan,
Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sports
and Tourism Education, 9(1), pp. 101-109
Collis, J. & Hussey, R. (2003). Business Research. 2nd Ed. Basingstoke:
Palgrave Macmillan
Collison, F.M and Spears, D.L (2010), Preview
Marketing cultural and heritage tourism: the Marshall Islands, International Journal of Culture, Tourism
and Hospitality Research, 4(2), pp. 130-142
Cubillo, J.M., Sanchez, J. and Cervino, J. (2006),
‘‘International students’ decision-making process’’, International Journal of
Educational Management, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 101-15.
Diplari, A. and Dimou, I (2010), Public Tourism
Education and Training in Greece: A Study of the Necessity for Educational
Restructuring, Industry and Higher
Education, 24(2), pp. 115-120
Galal M.H.A (2011), E-learning as an alternative
strategy for tourism higher education in Egypt, Quality Assurance in Education, 19(4), pp. 357-374
Gouna, E (2009), Tourism Education in Europe and
Overseas Employability in the View of Tourism Education Employability in the
View of Tourism Education, (Online) Available at:
http://www.etourismus.net/blogoscope/Tourism%20Education%20Christian%20Maurer.pdf
(Accessed 22 July 2013)
Jamrozy, U (2007), Marketing of tourism: a paradigm
shift toward sustainability, International
Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 1(2), pp. 117-130
Kaynak, E. and Ali, K (2012), Assessing tourism
market potential in a dynamic emerging economy, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logisticsm, 24(2), pp.
199-221
Maggi, R. and Croce, V. (2005), ‘‘The Lugano Tourism
Indicator – a competitiveness indicator for city tourism destinations in
Europe’’, The Future of City Tourism in Europe, WTO, Paris.
UNWTO, (2013), World
Tourism Barometer, (Online) Available at:
http://dtxtq4w60xqpw.cloudfront.net/sites/all/files/pdf/unwto_barom13_01_jan_excerpt_0.pdf
(Accessed 22 July 2013)
VisitBritain, (2013), About VisitBritain, (Online) Available at:
http://www.visitbritain.org/ (Accessed 22 July 2013)
1.
To what extent does higher education in tourism
contribute to wealth creation?
2.
How would you compare this contribution to the
impact of globalisation?
3.
What factors influence the distribution of HTE
institutions?
4.
Is there a difference in the performance of the
tourism sector where there is a higher concentration of HTE institutions?
5.
In regards to the distribution question, is
there a causative relationship between concentration of HTE institutions and
wealth creation in tourism?
6.
How does HTE impact creativity in the tourism
industry?
7.
In relation to the question 6 above, is there a
causative relationship between concentration of HTE institutions and creativity
in tourism?
8.
Does the globalisation of education introduce
change in relation to the impact of concentration of HTE institutions?
No comments:
Post a Comment