Search This Blog

Monday, 19 June 2017

Cultural dimensions and dilemmas

Value orientations and dimensions
Kluckhohn & Strodtbeck define value  orientations as:
                       being complex principles
                       resulting of interaction between three elements:
-Cognitive, affective, directive

Three assumptions:
      Universal nature of value orientations
      Many ways of solving problems
      Preferences in choosing solutions


Five orientations
Five problems common to all human groupings
1. Human nature orientation (goodness or badness of human nature)
2. Mannature orientation (harmony-with-nature/mastery-over-nature)
3. Time orientation (past/present/future)
4. Activity orientation (being, being-in-becoming and doing)
5. Relational orientation (man’s relation to other men)

Trompenaars’ dimensions
Trompenaars goes beyond the framework of anthropology/sociology
He shows how the following dimensions affect the process of managing cultures:
      relations with other people
      relations with time
      relations with nature

Trompenaars standpoint:
      Each culture has its own specific solutions for universal problems


Seven dimensions
                1. Universalism versus particularism
                2. Individualism versus collectivism
                3. Neutral versus affective relationships
                4. Specific versus diffuse relationships
                5. Achievement versus ascription
                6. Relation to time: sequential/synchronic
                7. Relation to the environment: inner- versus     outer-directed

Relations to the others
1. Universalism/particularism: societal versus     personal obligation
2. Individualism/collectivism (Communitarianism):           personal versus group goals
3. Neutral/affective relationships: emotional      orientation
4. Specific/diffuse relationships: contract versus               contact
5. Achievement/ascription: legitimating power and         status

Relations to time and the environment

Management dilemmas & dimensions
In practice dilemmas are typically between:
1. Universalism–particularism
      Legal contracts and loose interpretations
      Low cost strategies or premium strategy
      Extending rules or discovering exceptions
2. Individualism–collectivism (Communitarianism)
      Profit or market share strategy
      Originating ideas or refining useful products
3. Neutral or affectivity
      Long pauses or frequent interruptions
      Being professional or engaged
4. Specific–diffuse
      Data and codification or concepts and models
      Being results-oriented or process-oriented
5. Achieved or ascribed status
      Pay for performance or vindication for worth
Head-hunting or developing in-house
6. Sequential or synchronic time
      Highly rational, standardised production or just-in-time production
      Keeping to schedule or being easily distracted
7. Inner or outer directed
      Strategically oriented or fusion oriented
      Dauntless entrepreneur or public benefactor

Trompenaars versus Hofstede dimensions
The nature of Trompenaars’ dimensions and Hofstede dimensions is very different in approach:
Trompenaars:
      cultures are more like circles with ‘preferred arcs joined together’
      seen as a ‘model-to-learn-with’
Hofstede:
      linear forms where cultures are positioned high or low or in the middle
      seeking ‘the perfect model’

Reconciling cultural dilemmas
       The dilemmas in each of the seven dimensions require some kind of resolution
       Trompenaars’ methodology aims to reconcile what appear to be opposing values within the dimensions
       Cultures are seen as ‘dancing’ from one preferred end of a dimension to another

How does reconciliation
work?
Reconciliation results in the integration of values through synergy
There are many ways of achieving synergy:
1. Processing: a dilemma is made into two processes
2. Contextualising: what is text and what is context
3. Sequencing: every process of reconciliation is a                             sequence
4. Synergizing: adding the word through between the   two opposite alternative orientations

The reconciliation process

Conclusion
       The Trompenaars’ dimensions reflect the value-orientation concept proposed by Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck
       The cross-cultural manager has to face universal dilemmas, but the way they are resolved is culturally determined

       Rather than the dimensions themselves, it is the concept of reconciliation which distinguishes the work of Trompenaars (and Hampden-Turner) from that of Hofstede

No comments:

Post a Comment