Search This Blog

Monday, 19 June 2017

Dimensions of culture in business

Values in Culture
       Human values are defined as desirable goals, varying in importance that serve as guiding principles in people’s lives.

Values
      Learned from the culture in which individual is reared (group)
      Differences in cultural values may result in varying management practices
      Basic convictions that people have about
       Right and wrong
       Good and bad
Important and unimportant

Values are beliefs
      about desirable goals in life
      arouse feeling when pursued or frustrated
 Values apply across situations
      Values (e.g. honesty, security, freedom)   are relevant at home, office, with friends
       motivate choice of behaviour - what we do
        justify past behaviour - why we do it
       determine standards to evaluate people and events - who and what we like
direct attention and perception - what we notice

Value priorities are relatively stable
       form during childhood
       become stable in adolescence
       may change gradually in adulthood
       change more in response to dramatic  experiences (death of partner; sudden poverty) or therapy

Forms of Address
       Degree of formality
       When do you use titles, what titles do you use (civil status, professional titles or educational title)?
       First name or last name ?
      In many cultures first names are only for family and friends
      In China ? Explain the construction of Chinese names?
       How do you show respect for a superior?
                - the way you speak, polite words, title, body language

Greeting Rituals
      How do you introduce yourself to a business contact?
      Exchange of business cards, in China and Australia
      Greeting with or without exchange of names
      Do you introduce your colleagues?
      Are women supposed to shake hands?
      Handshake, Kissing and Hugging Rituals,
       After how long time is this required?
      In most cultures it is polite to acknowledge that you have met the person before!
       In Australia – important to remember name?
       In France, Norway important to say Thank you for last time
       In China and Thailand ?

Making Contact
Personal space
How much do you want to reveal of your private life.
How much of your space is public versus private space ?
Do you mix private life and work ?
Social interaction at work – Karaoke, alcohol and other issues. (eg. China and Japan)

Dress Codes at Work
Formal or informal (Australia vs Japan)
Different rules for men and women? (China, double measurement)
In Italy (Rome) I found that women could not dress up too much. (Men had it easy!)
In Norway, even at Ministerial level you could dress in T-shirt and Jeans, but different when meeting other officials.
What is the rule in China, Thailand, Saudi Arabic, Philippines?
Dress in a way to match your customer?

Written versus Verbal Contracts
Is your word more worth than a written paper ?
What guards you binding commitments ?
Written contracts and lawyers or your reputation/word?
Example:
US = 279 lawyers per 100,000 people
UK = 114, Germany = 77, France = 29      Japan = 11

Value Similarities and Differences
Across Cultures
  1. Strong relationship between level of managerial success and personal values
  2. Value patterns predict  managerial success and can be used in selection/placement decisions
  3. Country differences in relationship between values and success; however, findings across U.S., Japan, Australia, India are similar
  4. Values of more successful managers favor pragmatic, dynamic, achievement-oriented and active role in interaction with others
  5. Values of less successful managers tend toward static and passive values; relatively passive roles in interacting with others

Understanding culture and management
Research on communication
                - Edward Hall
Research on different organizational functions
                - Nancy Adler
Research on organizational culture
                - Edgar Schein
Research on national culture
                - Geert Hofstede
                - Fons Trompenaars


National cultural dimensions in the business context
Geert Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions
       Hofstede was one of the first researchers to analyze the influence of NATIONAL culture on management practices (1980s)
       Empirical study at large multinational company (IBM)
       66 national subsidiaries
       116,000 questionnaires
       60 out of 150 questions concerned values and opinions.
-Now scores showing relative positions of 70+ countries
-Rank ordered countries

Four aspects of national culture
Hofstede’s cultural dimensions
Four aspects of national culture that affect our thinking about organizations :
1. Power distance
2. Uncertainty avoidance
3. Individualism/Collectivism
4. Masculinity/Femininity

The fifth dimension
5. Short-term versus long-term orientation
      This dimension was NOT found in the data used to determine the original dimensions (Hofstede, 2001)
      This dimension emerges from a survey
      the Chinese Values Survey (1985) which contained a Confucian dynamism scale.

Power distance dimension
Power distance: Less powerful members accept that power is distributed unequally
       High power distance countries: people blindly obey superiors; centralized, tall structures (e.g. Mexico, South Korea, India, China)
       Low power distance countries: flatter, decentralized structures, smaller ratio of supervisor to employee (e.g., Austria, Ireland, Norway)
- Is Australia a high power distance country or low power distance country?

Low/High power distance dimension

Collectivist/Individualist dimension
Individualism:  People look after selves and immediate family only
       High individualism countries: wealthier, protestant work ethic, greater individual initiative, promotions based on market value (e.g., U.S., Canada, Sweden)
       High collectivism countries: poorer, less support of Protestant work ethic, less individual initiative, promotions based on seniority (e.g., Indonesia, Pakistan)

Masculinity/Femininity
 dimension
Masculinity: dominant social values are success, money, and things
High masculine countries: stress earnings, recognition, advancement, challenge, wealth; high job stress (e.g., Germanic countries)
High feminine countries: emphasize caring for others and quality of life; cooperation, friendly atmosphere., employment security, group decision making; low job stress (e.g., Norway)


Uncertainty avoidance dimension
Uncertainty avoidance:  people feel threatened by ambiguous situations; create beliefs/institutions to avoid such situations
       High uncertainty avoidance countries: high need for security, strong belief in experts and their knowledge; structure organizational activities, more written rules, less managerial risk taking (e.g., Germany, Japan, Spain) 

       Low uncertainty avoidance countries: people more willing to accept risks of the unknown, less structured organizational activities, fewer written rules, more managerial risk taking, higher employee turnover, more ambitious employees (e.g., Denmark and Great Britain)

 The effect of Hofstede’s four dimensions
 on issues in management and business

Time Orientation Dimensions
       Long Term Orientation is directed at the future and seeks future rewards through perseverance and thrift
       Short Term Orientation is directed at the past and present through respect for tradition, fulfilling social obligations and seeking immediate rewards

Criticism of Hofstede’s model
Criticisms include
       surveys to measure culture -> unsuitable
       nations as units of analysis -> not the most appropriate

surveys at only one company -> information cannot be about entire national cultures

No comments:

Post a Comment