Search This Blog

Saturday 24 June 2017

Balancing Responsibilities to Shareholders and Stakeholders

The Shareholder Value Approach
n  Historically strong in the UK and USA
n  Sees the firm as the private property of its owners
n  Managers should serve needs of customers and shareholders
n  Links to the concept of competitive advantage
n  Customer needs come first
n  Profits are gained by satisfying these needs
n  Shareholder needs are satisfied by dividends and capital growth

Changing Shareholder Expectations of Value over Time
Life Cycle of a Business
n  Start Up
n  Finance comes from venture capitalists, banks etc
n  Backers hope for high growth in capital value; no dividends
n  Growth
n  Growth equity investors buy out the venture capitalists
n  Backers expect moderate to high capital growth; no dividends
n  Maturity
n  Public limited company, shares traded on stock market
n  Backers expect dividends and hope for some capital growth
n  Decline
n  Capital value declines and the firm can no longer pay dividends

The Stakeholder Value Approach
n  Instrumental form: embraces economic interest groups
n  Trading partners
n  Financiers and shareholders
n  Board of directors, top management teams and employees
These are de Wit and Meyer’s primary stakeholders (Handout p. 274)
n  Normative form: also embraces groups with wider social or environmental interests
n  Governments
n  Community groups
n  Environmental activists and/or human rights protesters
These are de Wit and Meyer’s secondary stakeholders (Handout p. 274)

Balancing Shareholder and Stakeholder Values:
The Triple Bottom Line
n  People
n  Planet
n  Profits
An important agenda for the UN and NGOs
n  Brundtland Report (1987) Our Common Future
n  John Elkington (1997) Cannibals with Forks
n  UN Global Compact (2000): Businesses are invited to sign up to 10 principles relating to human rights, labour, environment and corruption
                (Lawrence and Beamish 2013: source text for Coursework Component Two case study)

The 10 Principles of the UN Global Compact
n  Principle 1: Businesses should support and respect the protection of internationally proclaimed human rights; and
n  Principle 2: make sure that they are not complicit in human rights abuses.  
n  Principle 3: Businesses should uphold the freedom of association and the effective recognition of the right to collective bargaining;
n  Principle 4: the elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labour;
n  Principle 5: the effective abolition of child labour; and
n  Principle 6: the elimination of discrimination in respect of employment and occupation. 
n  Principle 7: Businesses should support a precautionary approach to environmental challenges;
n  Principle 8: undertake initiatives to promote greater environmental responsibility; and
n  Principle 9: encourage the development and diffusion of environmentally friendly technologies.   
Principle 10: Businesses should work against corruption in all its forms, including extortion and bribery


Corporate Social Responsibility
n  Moving beyond compliance with laws and benchmark standards
n  Distinctive mission and values integrated with management practice
n  Differing stakeholder interests reconciled
n  Reputation with consumers enhanced by evident care for human rights and dignity, workforce welfare and ecological sustainability
n  Relationships with governments strengthened by positive contribution to national economic and social development

Key differences between levels of social innovation (Frynas and Mellahi 2011: 394)
Strategic planning
Investment
Example
In-market Innovation
Short term
Small- to medium-scale funding
Petroleum company develops low-emission fuel
New Market Creation
Medium term
Medium- to large-scale funding, may involve new resources/capabilities
Shell’s investments in solar energy
Leadership
Long term
Large-scale funding, requires new resources/capabilities
BP’s initiative to combat climate change

Identifying Stakeholders
(Adapted from HARRISON J.S. (2003) Strategic Management of Resources and Relationships. Chichester: Wiley, p. 37)

Stakeholders of Shell International 
(Frynas and Mellahi 2011: 385)

Analysing Stakeholder Interactions
n  Identify the strategic issue and the facts of the case
n  Generate a range of options for managing the problem
n  Identify the stakeholders who have a direct interest in the outcome
n  Analyse the nature of each stakeholder’s interest and decide how to manage the firm’s interactions with this player on this issue

Consider:
n  What is the nature of each group’s interest in the case?
n  Do they all agree on ‘the facts’?
n  Which are critical, and which are supportive, of the management’s current approach? What values do they express in justifying their positions?
n  For each group, ask how much influence it is likely to have over the outcome: is it
n  Internal/Connected/External to the organisation?
n  Strong or weak in its Power/Influence?
n  Intensely or only casually interested in the outcome?
                 
Stakeholder Mapping: The Mendelow Grid

No comments:

Post a Comment