Changing The Business Model
1) Customer
Value Proposition
n Who
are your target customers?
n What
is the problem or need you will help them with?
n How
will you meet their needs?
2) Key
Resources (needed to deliver the CVP)
3) Key
Processes (Porter’s Value Chain activities)
4) Profit
Formula (costs and revenues)
Managers look at how these factors will vary
n as
the SCALE of output rises
n over
TIME – lead times, throughput, cash flows
n over
SPACE – do you need to adapt the business model when you move beyond your home
market?
(Johnson, M.W., Christensen, C.M. and Kagermann, H. (2008)
Reinventing Your Business Model. Harvard Business Review. 86/12 p: 50)
Innovation within the Product Life Cycle (Frynas & Mellahi 2011: Ch 11)
Product innovation: the development of a new or enhanced
product
Process innovation: the implementation of a new or improved
production or delivery method
The Strategic Management Process:
Supports Innovation and Change
n Strategic management is “the process of
strategic decision-making that sets the long-term direction for the
organisation” (Frynas & Mellahi, 2011: 8)
n The central thrust of strategic management is
achieving a sustainable competitive advantage
n The strategy-making process involves ‘key
decisions’ made by negotiation within the organization and with its business
partners and other interested parties (stakeholders - Week 8)
n Many MNEs are in fact business groups with
interlocking shareholdings and a complex network of relationships linking
subsidiaries incorporated separately in each location – this complicates
negotiations further
Capabilities and Competitive Advantage
n Competitive
advantage: The ability to use resources effectively and to deliver
n a
combination of price and performance valued by the target group of buyers
n better
than the competition
n generating
superior profit levels for the firm
n Distinctive
capabilities: a wide range including innovation, flexibility and reputation
(Week 4)
n Must
create value for customers, be rare and hard to copy
n If
they are valuable but not rare, they are necessary or threshold – rather than
distinctive or core – resources
n Innovation
as a capability: springs from an organisation’s ability to manage change and to
learn from experience and from environmental cues
Three Models of Innovation
(Bartlett et al 2011: Ch 5)
n Central:
pursuing efficiency
n Global
strategy, centralised hub configuration, strong product (business) managers
n Local:
building responsiveness
n Multinational
strategy, decentralised federation configuration, strong geographic (area)
managers
n Transnational:
sharing learning
n Transnational
strategy, integrated network configuration, locally leveraged and globally
linked
n Remember
Week 6? A complex organisational form, governed by simple rules (Sull and
Eisenhardt 2012)
n Functional
managers scan globally for new ideas, both inside and outside the organisation
- and champion new ideas within the MNE
n Geographic
managers identify the need for new ideas, develop their own and implement others
locally
MNEs: Motives, Strategies and Organizational Configurations
Central Innovation (Japan 1980s)
Local Innovation
(Europe since 1930s)
Transnational Innovation:
Two Emerging Processes
n Locally leveraged
n Local opportunity sensed – and
responded to – by subsidiary
n Implementation carried out worldwide
n Globally linked
n Shares the resources and
capabilities of many operations
n New activity is jointly created and
managed
The Integrated Network:
Locally Leveraged and Globally Linked
Managing Global R&D Networks (Frynas & Mellahi 2011: 370)
Networking Beyond the Boundaries of the Organisation
n The
learning organisation has its limits: tends to adopt
n evolutionary
(small-step, or continuous) rather than
n revolutionary
(episodic, disruptive) patterns of change
n Experience
of Procter and Gamble (Huston and Sakkab 2006)
n example
of Pringles potato crisps: application of radically new printing technology to
add words and pictures
n P&G
had adopted the integrated network configuration in late 1980s, but couldn’t
make this leap alone
n Networking
with outsiders (entrepreneurial SMEs) supported cutting-edge new product
development
n Markides
C. And Geroski P. (2005) Fast Second. Wiley ebook: suggests that
n SMEs
are best at creating radical new markets
n Established
corporations are best at scaling up and consolidation - so both sides can gain
from alliances
Connection to our core text:
Frynas & Mellahi (2011) Ch 10
n Evolutionary,
continuous change is also known as incremental change (pp. 318-9)
n Revolutionary,
disruptive change is also known as transformational change (pp. 319-20)
n Our
core text authors have referenced their table on this (p. 319) to UHBS’ own
Professor Ralph Stacey – but beware...
n In
Stacey’s view, transformational change (in products and delivery
methods: top down) is different from transformational management processes
(interactions which change people’s way of thinking through
conversation)
Differences between Incremental and Transformational Change
Transformational Conversations and Organisational Learning
De Wit & Meyer (2010: Ch 9, The Organizational Context)
n The
organizational leadership perspective (Kotter 1990: What Leaders Really Do. Harvard
Business Review, 68, 3: 103-111): organizations thrive when a strong leader
runs them well
n Develops
a distinctive vision and decides what to do: proposes transformational
change
n Inspires
others and uses central control to ensure compliance
n The
organizational dynamics perspective (Stacey 2007): whether leaders like it or
not, they are involved in an interdependent relationship with their followers:
they struggle to make a difference and on a good day, they engage in transformational
conversations
n Through
the interplay of intentions, people change their thinking
n Leaders
help order to emerge by setting simple rules, influencing the way followers
think when solving problems: people use their learning to make better business
decisions
n Emergent
strategy develops as organized chaos (Brown and Eisenhardt 1998: Competing on the edge : strategy as
structured chaos . Harvard Business School Press)
Maybe it depends on their style… (Frynas & Mellahi 2011: 331-333)
Or maybe it depends on the skills of the change agents
who work for them...
Change Agents: Key skills
(Frynas
and Mellahi 2011: 325-331)
n Clear understanding of top
management objectives including how and why these change
n Political awareness – ability to
mediate conflict
n Sensitivity to the views of
employees including classic phases of the coping cycle (denial, defence,
discarding, adaptation, internalization)
n Communication and negotiation
n Team-building and leadership
n Individual characteristics: energy,
enthusiasm, high tolerance of ambiguity and risk
innovation consultant, A very awesome blog post. We are really grateful for your blog post. You will find a lot of approaches after visiting your post.
ReplyDelete