Values
in Culture
• Human values are defined as
desirable goals, varying in importance that serve as guiding principles in
people’s lives.
Values
– Learned from the culture in which
individual is reared (group)
– Differences in cultural values may
result in varying management practices
– Basic convictions that people have
about
•
Right
and wrong
•
Good
and bad
Important
and unimportant
Values
are beliefs
– about desirable goals in life
– arouse feeling when pursued or
frustrated
Values apply across
situations
– Values (e.g. honesty, security,
freedom) are relevant at home, office,
with friends
• motivate choice of behaviour - what
we do
• justify past behaviour - why we do it
• determine standards to evaluate
people and events - who and what we like
direct
attention and perception - what we notice
Value
priorities are relatively stable
• form during childhood
• become stable in adolescence
• may change gradually in adulthood
• change more in response to
dramatic experiences (death of partner;
sudden poverty) or therapy
Forms of
Address
• Degree of formality
• When do you use titles, what titles
do you use (civil status, professional titles or educational title)?
• First name or last name ?
– In many cultures first names are
only for family and friends
– In China ? Explain the construction
of Chinese names?
• How do you show respect for a
superior?
- the way you speak, polite words, title, body
language
Greeting Rituals
– How do you introduce yourself to a
business contact?
– Exchange of business cards, in China
and Australia
– Greeting with or without exchange of
names
– Do you introduce your colleagues?
– Are women supposed to shake hands?
– Handshake, Kissing and Hugging
Rituals,
•
After
how long time is this required?
– In most cultures it is polite to
acknowledge that you have met the person before!
•
In
Australia – important to remember name?
•
In
France, Norway important to say Thank you for last time
•
In
China and Thailand ?
Making
Contact
Personal
space
How much do
you want to reveal of your private life.
How much of
your space is public versus private space ?
Do you mix
private life and work ?
Social
interaction at work – Karaoke, alcohol and other issues. (eg. China and Japan)
Dress
Codes at Work
Formal or
informal (Australia vs Japan)
Different rules
for men and women? (China, double measurement)
In Italy
(Rome) I found that women could not dress up too much. (Men had it easy!)
In Norway,
even at Ministerial level you could dress in T-shirt and Jeans, but different
when meeting other officials.
What is the
rule in China, Thailand, Saudi Arabic, Philippines?
Dress in a
way to match your customer?
Written
versus Verbal Contracts
Is your
word more worth than a written paper ?
What guards
you binding commitments ?
Written
contracts and lawyers or your reputation/word?
Example:
US = 279
lawyers per 100,000 people
UK = 114,
Germany = 77, France = 29 Japan = 11
Value
Similarities and Differences
Across Cultures
Across Cultures
- Strong relationship between
level of managerial success and personal values
- Value patterns predict managerial success and can be used in
selection/placement decisions
- Country differences in
relationship between values and success; however, findings across U.S.,
Japan, Australia, India are similar
- Values of more successful
managers favor pragmatic, dynamic, achievement-oriented and active role in
interaction with others
- Values of less successful
managers tend toward static and passive values; relatively passive roles
in interacting with others
Understanding culture and management
Research
on communication
- Edward Hall
Research
on different organizational functions
- Nancy Adler
Research on
organizational culture
- Edgar Schein
Research
on national culture
- Geert Hofstede
- Fons Trompenaars
National cultural dimensions in the business context
Geert
Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions
• Hofstede was one of the first
researchers to analyze the influence of NATIONAL culture on management
practices (1980s)
• Empirical study at large multinational
company (IBM)
• 66 national subsidiaries
• 116,000 questionnaires
• 60 out of 150 questions concerned
values and opinions.
-Now
scores showing relative positions of 70+ countries
-Rank
ordered countries
Four
aspects of national culture
Hofstede’s
cultural dimensions
Four
aspects of national culture that affect our thinking about organizations :
1. Power
distance
2.
Uncertainty avoidance
3.
Individualism/Collectivism
4.
Masculinity/Femininity
The fifth
dimension
5. Short-term
versus long-term orientation
– This dimension was NOT found in the data
used to determine the original dimensions (Hofstede, 2001)
– This dimension emerges from a survey
– the Chinese Values Survey (1985) which
contained a Confucian dynamism scale.
Power
distance dimension
Power
distance: Less powerful members accept that power is distributed unequally
• High power distance countries:
people blindly obey superiors; centralized, tall structures (e.g. Mexico, South
Korea, India, China)
• Low power distance countries:
flatter, decentralized structures, smaller ratio of supervisor to employee
(e.g., Austria, Ireland, Norway)
- Is
Australia a high power distance country or low power distance country?
Low/High power
distance dimension
Collectivist/Individualist dimension
Individualism: People look after selves and immediate family
only
• High individualism countries:
wealthier, protestant work ethic, greater individual initiative, promotions
based on market value (e.g., U.S., Canada, Sweden)
• High collectivism countries: poorer,
less support of Protestant work ethic, less individual initiative, promotions
based on seniority (e.g., Indonesia, Pakistan)
Masculinity/Femininity
dimension
Masculinity:
dominant social values are success, money, and things
High
masculine countries: stress earnings, recognition, advancement, challenge,
wealth; high job stress (e.g., Germanic countries)
High
feminine countries: emphasize caring for others and quality of life;
cooperation, friendly atmosphere., employment security, group decision making;
low job stress (e.g., Norway)
Uncertainty avoidance dimension
Uncertainty
avoidance: people feel threatened by
ambiguous situations; create beliefs/institutions to avoid such situations
• High uncertainty avoidance
countries: high need for security, strong belief in experts and their
knowledge; structure organizational activities, more written rules, less
managerial risk taking (e.g., Germany, Japan, Spain)
• Low uncertainty avoidance countries:
people more willing to accept risks of the unknown, less structured
organizational activities, fewer written rules, more managerial risk taking,
higher employee turnover, more ambitious employees (e.g., Denmark and Great Britain)
The effect of Hofstede’s four dimensions
on issues in management and business
Time Orientation Dimensions
• Long Term Orientation is directed at
the future and seeks future rewards through perseverance and thrift
• Short Term Orientation is directed
at the past and present through respect for tradition, fulfilling social
obligations and seeking immediate rewards
Criticism of Hofstede’s model
Criticisms
include
• surveys to measure culture ->
unsuitable
• nations as units of analysis -> not the
most appropriate
surveys at only
one company -> information cannot be about entire national cultures
No comments:
Post a Comment