Search This Blog

Thursday, 22 June 2017

International Employment Regulation and Employment Relations

Regulation
—  Political and Economic Context
—  Purpose: to facilitate social and economic production
—  Stability; expectations, rules, social control
—  Market regulation (de-regulation) versus Interventionism

Regulatory Issues
—  Values
—  Isomorphic pressures – sanctions
—  Mimetic – voluntary; best way or best practice
—  Power struggles i.e. De-regulation in the UK 1980s/1990s
¡  Management consultants (PWC – flexibility)
¡  Politically right wing think tanks (CPS in the UK; Heritage Foundation in the US)
¡  Union busting consultancies
¡  Thatcherism
—  Increasing importance of CSR
—  Beyond the nation state
—  1990s: New politics of labour management
—  Reaction against unfettered power of MNCs
—  New actors
¡  Increasing concern with labour standards
¡  Social conditions of employment
¡  Minimum standards
—  Formal and informal codes of conduct
¡  Remains uneven and weak

New Projects of Regulation
—  Standardisation of labour markets
—  Health and safety
—  Labour standards and codes of practice (ILO, OECD, UN, EU)
¡  Both market oriented and left of centre
—  Ethical
¡  OXFAM, WoW, Fairtrade etc.
¡  Shape political framework, educate consumers

Trade Unions
—  ‘a continuous association  of wage earners for the purpose of maintaining and improving the conditions of their working lives’
—  Structure
—  Membership
—  Orientation
—  Objectives

TU structures
—  Industrial (Specific Industries – UNISON)
—  General (Across industries – GMB)
—  Specific  Occupation  (UCU)
—  Enterprise (Japan, South Korea)
—  Confederations: single (i.e. UK, USA, Nigeria) or multiple
¡  Based on political i.e. Belgium, Cyprus
¡   Religion i.e. Italy
¡  Occupation i.e. Nordic countries
—  Supra-national (ETUC, ITUC-Africa)

Membership
—  Sweden 70.8%
—  Finland 70.3%
—  Denmark 69.1%
—  UK 24.9%
—  Hungary 16.9%
Decline in membership in developing countries
Growth in other areas, for example, South Africa - COSATU
—  China 92%
—  US   11.6%
—  France  7.8%
—  Singapore around 17%
—  Hong Kong 22.48%
—  Venezuela 20% (of formal workforce – 47% of workers in the informal economy)
—  Decline in developed capitalist economies
—  South Africa COSATU – growth in membership in 1990s
—  Explanations for decline
—  Business Cycle
—  Unemployment
—  Legal reforms and state policy i.e. Privatization
—  Employer policies
—  Rise of HRM

TU Orientations
—  Europe
¡  German, UK:  Instrumental (pay, conditions, etc.)
¡  France , Italy: Political, religious
—  USA
¡  Origins in socialism and class consciousness
¡  Late 19th century emphasis on instrumental issues
—  Japan
¡  Collusion, company loyalty

Employers Associations
—  Supra-national
¡  EU ‘Business Europe’ – negotiates with ETUC
¡  26 sectoral committees
—  National level
¡  Single or multiple

Employee Participation
—  Works councils in Europe discuss issues such as redundancy, profit sharing, changes to conditions, financial plans, working practices, personnel policies, health and safety
—  USA: non-unionised focus on self-managing teams, QCs, dissemination of corporate culture.  Partnership agreements in unionised companies
—  Japan: QCs, team-work, problem-solving groups etc.

Employment Relations and MNCs
—  Adaption to host country circumstances or assertion of home country custom and practice?
—  Depends on vested interests and power i.e.
¡  US multinationals in UK less likely to recognize trade unions (within limited TU rights to recognition) but more likely to localize practice in Germany and Sweden
¡  US MNCs more likely to set up subsidiaries in less regulated regions
—  MNCs have the power to disrupt national agreements through relocation

Examples of International ER Issues
—  Support for migrant workers (ITUC)
—  Support for low paid garment workers – linked to 2012 London Olympics (ITUC)
—  Support for Colombian trade unionists (ITUC)

—  Future of collective bargaining in Europe (ETUC) 

No comments:

Post a Comment