In supply chain management, it is
crucial that quality and cost considerations are made. Lessons drawn from the
Horse Meat scandal reveal the difficulty of having a complex supply chain and
the risk of failing to ensure that products are traceable to the original
suppliers. This brings out complex supply chains as risky. Nevertheless,
technological advancements enable ease of identification of unruly suppliers
where final products can be traced back to the suppliers. The Horse Meat scandal
reveals questions of supply chain design hence making it necessary to evaluate theories
and concepts that can be used to design reliable and sustainable supply chains.
The process of designing a supply chain
can best be understood using the six sigma doctrine whose main phases are:
define goals, measure critical to quality capabilities and processes, analyse
to develop design alternatives, develop an improved design, and verify the
design. The generation of goals is facilitated using TQM which focuses on the
whole organisation and how it can be aligned to deliver on customer needs. The
theory also works in determining how changing customer needs necessitate change
in the design of the supply chain. These changes can then be implemented using
the six sigma doctrine to ensure that there is consistency between
organisational processes and changes in the market. The guiding principle is
lean management which is a management concept aimed at ensuring that
organisations minimise waste and keep production costs at the lowest possible
level.
Irrespective of the specific
characteristics of the supply chains, there are a number of features that are
applicable universally. These include cost minimisation, agility, capacity to
deliver on quality, and the ability to meet customer expectations. These
qualities can be categorised into upstream and downstream supply chains. The upstream supply chains are characterised
by sourcing approaches as well as quality control in a bid to ensure that the
materials delivered to them are of a desired quality. It also refers to the
level of complexity as characterised by the number of suppliers and their mode
of operation. Efforts to ensure that there is quality control should be
tampered with the need for cost minimisation. Excessive testing can be costly
while minimal testing raises quality risks. This is why a tracking system and
strict penalties for default can be combined to ensure that suppliers take
greater responsibility for quality.
The downstream logistics are
characterised by the need to fulfil on delivery times expected by customers
while using an operational model that minimises delivery costs. This is a
crucial part of supply chain as it plays a crucial role in determining the
extent to which an organisation can be considered to be competitive. The most
appropriate supply chains are those that will facilitate meeting customer
expectations while reducing the cost of operations. In the end, it is the
organisations that are able to design and implement stable and effective
logistics networks that are able to sustain a competitive edge in the market.
The Horse Meat scandal was characterised
by horse meat products being found in beef products across the UK. Some of the
suppliers are said to have intentionally mixed beef with horse meat. The motive
is believed to have been the need to raise profits as horse meat is cheaper
than beef (Ord, 2013). A review of the supply chain for meat products indicates
that the scandal occurred due to weaknesses associated with the complexity of
the supply chain. The level of complexity was such that it was very difficult
to trace the beef contamination to a single supplier.
Complex supply chains are characterised
by having numerous suppliers, many of whom could be secondary suppliers acting
as middlemen that purchase products from the source in order to supply to the
manufacturers (Kurbel, 2013). Complexity can be advantageous in guaranteeing
stable supply with the numerous players having the effect of gathering the
supplies from different sources as required. It also helps in promoting
competition among suppliers hence leading to lower cost of raw materials. In
the beef products supply chain; these advantages had been exploited leading to
the growth of a vibrant yet complex supply chain that served to ensure that
constant supply was guaranteed (Butler, 2013). However, the complexity
heightened risks of abuse and poor quality as was manifested in Horse Meat
scandal.
Despite the quality check mechanism that
was in place, the horse meat was able to penetrate the supply chain to an
extent that it became a scandal affecting the whole country (Butler, 2013).
This implies that the system was either too complex or the supply chain was not
functioning as was designed. In theory, such risks are highest in complex
supply chains where quality control is most difficult (Davarzani, Zegordi and Norrman,
2011). This leads to the suggestion that simplicity and transparency in supply
chains can be used to minimise such risks. Supply chains risks can be minimised
by engaging in strict prequalification procedures where only suppliers that are
stable and have been known to embrace supply chain ethics are allowed to supply
to an organisation. This safeguard has however not been found to be fool proof
as some of the retailers caught up in the Horse Meat scandal claimed to have
very strict prequalification processes (Butler, 2013). It’s therefore necessary
for prequalification to extend to being involved in monitoring the operational
approaches of the suppliers. This extensive involvement is only possible to
implement in simpler supply chains that involve few suppliers through
contracting.
Contracting helps in promoting
transparency within the supply chain. It’s consideration as a potential
solution to the Horse Meat scandal is due to the lack of transparency in the UK
meat supply chain that made it difficult to pinpoint the source of the
contamination (Tan, 2013). An alternative approach would be to enter into
contracts with suppliers where verifiable mechanisms for quality control are
established and inspection of supplier quality facilitated. The contracts could
even go further to dictate the specific production approach hence making them
less vulnerable to unscrupulous secondary suppliers.
Contracting is an alternative to
backward integration, a modification that puts organisations in full control of
their supply chains (Ritchie and Brindley, 2007). This option is nevertheless
rarely embraced as the dynamics of relative competitive advantage take centre
stage. A clearer solution would be one that facilitates tracking down products
to the suppliers. Modern technology makes it easy to install supply chain
management systems that can be exploited to track down products to the original
suppliers (Prater, 2013). In the context of the meat supply chain, the meat
used in a product could be traced to the farmer that raised the livestock if it
is well implemented. In reference to the Horse Meat scandal, such a system
would have been instrumental in pin pointing the supplier that distributed the
products but also the specific farmers that were involved in misleading the
public. This would ensure that quality control is done effectively and that
mischief is promptly identified and punished. The system could however be
expensive and complex. It could also prove cumbersome where a products being
manufactured involve supplies from many suppliers.
From the discussions above, the Horse
Meat scandal could have been avoided if the industry players had embraced a
simpler supply chain devoid of secondary suppliers and where the suppliers are
responsible for the rearing of livestock. Quality would have also been easier
to assure if there was a system facilitating the tracking down of suppliers
using the products sold. Backward integration can also be encouraged at
different levels where the retailers could take greater responsibility in the
production of the raw materials that are needed. In other words, the Horse Meat
scandal lay in the supply chain design and correcting the same would help
eliminate similar risks in future.
Tesco’s logistics network is global in
nature and combines regional and store based approaches with the remarkable
element being the high level of automation. It is characterised by stores being
the main reference point for monitoring consumption patterns while upstream
logistics are coordinated at a regional level for most products (Smith and
Sparks, 2009). Also characteristic of the network is the growth of an online
portfolio where ordering is done via the internet and delivery done to at the
customers’ convenience. Irrespective of the diversity of the approaches used, the
Ready Meal logistics network at Tesco can be improved through either or several
of the following theories and elements of supply chain management:
Performance measurement entails the use
of certain metrics to provide an indication on the performance of the
organisation in terms of logistics network management (Arif and Pillania, 2008).
These measurements are crucial for enhancing efficiency and cost effectiveness.
Some of the common metrics include speed of movement from the supplier to the
customer and financial measures on cost per unit. These measures must be
inclusive, universal, measurable, and consistent. In reference to the Ready
Meal logistics network, product quality is among the measures that can be
imposed. Testing of products at different points can ensure that only supplies
of the desired quality are sold to the customers. Unit costs and delivery speed
can also be adopted to ensure that customer needs on price and delivery
timeline are adhered to. Its applicability to downstream logistics would
include establishing yardsticks for delivery timelines as per customer feedback
and measuring the same with an aim to identifying any faults that could be
evident in the system and in need of correction (Thakkar, Kanda and Deshmukh,
2009).
Sourcing mainly applies to upstream
logistics where the organisation identifies and enlists suppliers of the
required raw materials (Novak, 2011). A systemised approach to sourcing helps
in identifying reliable and reputable suppliers for purposes of ensuring that
the quality of supplies delivered is good. At Tesco, a sourcing approach is in
place where potential suppliers go through prequalification processes (Smith
and Sparks, 2009). However, additional vigilance needs to be done in evaluating
the past record of these suppliers.
Lean management combines upstream
logistics, internal operations, and downstream logistics to ensure that inventory
is minimised (Mistry, 2005). This requires accurate forecasting and reporting
and a high level of coordination where suppliers avail more raw materials in
time. Production capacity is therefore matched to projected demand and supplies
delivered in time for production. This strategic approach is compatible with
the Just-in-Time operations model where coordination is done with suppliers to
have supplied delivered just when they are needed (Wee and Wu, 2009). Given the
low inventory maintained in the lean management approach, the risk of
interruption is high as a delay in delivery could easily lead to stock
shortages. This could lead to loss of customers. Nevertheless, it keeps
production and inventory costs low (Wee and Wu, 2009). Besides, ease of
implementing it is enhanced by modern technology that makes it easy to improve
accuracy in forecasting and coordination. For a company that is highly advanced
technologically like Tesco, it would be quite easy to coordinate activities
hence making lean management easy to implement.
Total Quality Management (TQM) is one of
the concepts of management that are easily applicable across all functions of
the organisation. The main pillar in TQM is customer focus where the
organisation focuses on understanding the customer needs and modifying internal
operations to suit these demands (Vanichchinchai and Igel, 2009). For Tesco, a
growing shift is the demand for e-commerce where customers prefer to shop
online, make online orders and have the products delivered to their homes or
offices (Smith and Sparks, 2009). This makes it important for the downstream
logistics to be modified accordingly with an efficient system for delivery of
products to customers coordinated appropriately. It would also entail the need
for greater coordination between the different stores where delivery can be
done by the store that is closest to the customer as opposed to the store that
took the order being compelled to do so at a higher cost.
TQM is more of a management philosophy
than it is a technical guide for logistics network management (Pfeifer, 2002).
This means that it does not stand alone and needs to be combined with other
supply chain management technics such as lean management. It is characterised
by performance measurement where the goals set are translated into measurable
metrics which are then used as yardsticks to determine the extent to which the
goals set are being met. Embracing TQM in Ready Meal logistics would ensure
that the customer becomes the focus of the organisation even as it embarks on
ensuring that the system is efficient and cost effective. It provides a basis
for dynamism based on evolving customer needs.
The focus of the Six Sigma doctrine is
the identification and removal of defects in the business or production
processes. It aims at creating an organisational network comprising of all
members of the organisation where each category of employees is assigned
specific tasks that have a direct impact on the sustainability and improvement
of the production process (Keller, 2011; Harry, et al, 2011). Its main features
are therefore as follows: continuous effort to achieve stable and predictable
process outcomes; establishment of metrics that are measurable and analysable;
and involving all members of the organisation in this process including senior
management. This doctrine is therefore very compatible with the goal of
ensuring that innovation is sustained in a manner that is sustainable and which
yields effectiveness for both the customer and the organisation (Webber and
Wallace, 2007). In this case, the doctrine would be focused on monitoring
customer satisfaction as the basis for improving production and delivery
processes.
The theories that are applicable in
supply chain management both on relation to the Horse Meat Scandal and to the
Ready Meal logistics network are Six Sigma, TQM, and Lean Management. These are
applicable in the Horse Meat scandal situation, the Ready Meal logistics
situation and the upstream/downstream scenarios in supply chain management. The
basic theory that applies to all situations in supply chain management is TQM.
Its main focus is the customer needs and how the entire organisation can be
aligned to ensure that such needs are fulfilled. This management approach helps
in ensuring that there is a sustainable approach through which evolution is
facilitated to suit changing customer needs from time to time (Huang, Gattiker
and Schroeder, 2008). It can help in ensuring that the competitiveness of the
supply chain is sustained in the long term. Having applied TQM to understand
the customer needs and how the organisation can satisfy them, a stable process
is generated.
The Six Sigma doctrine is useful for
translating an overall management approach into a process which can then be
implemented to ensure that the logistics network is stabilised and the outcome
made more predictable and measurable. The DMADV project in the doctrine can be
applied to develop a logistics network with the main phases being: define
goals, measure critical to quality capabilities and processes, analyse to
develop design alternatives, develop an improved design, and verify the design
(Harry and Schroeder, 2000). Once the design has been developed, the Six Sigma
doctrine can further be applied to facilitate continuous improvement. The TQM
model can be used to identify the changing market needs and their impact on
internal operations. The six sigma doctrine’s DMAIC (define, measure, analyse,
improve, control) methodology for improving logistics processes that are
already in existence can then be implemented to ensure that changing customer
needs are accommodated (Harry and Schroeder, 2000).
The lean management approach is an
overall management approach that focuses on the reduction of waste and ensuring
that operation costs are kept at the minimum (Agus and Hajinoor, 2012). This
overall approach can be used to ensure that production is organised in a manner
consistent with environmental sustainability goals while looking out for
organisational costs. Like the two theories above, its application would entail
the establishment of performance metrics which could then be factored into
design and subsequent efforts made to ensure that there is process improvement
on a regular basis.
Applying these theoretical bases to a
specific value chain (“farm” to the “fork”), the upstream logistics would
entail sourcing decisions and quality control approaches aimed at ensuring that
the quality of supplies is assured. The downstream logistics on the other hand
refer to the processes of getting the finished products to the customers. While
the traditional model for downward logistics were mostly restricted to spreading
store outlets to serve wider markets, the complexity of the same has been
increased by the growing preference for online shopping and the need for
delivery services. The upstream and downstream logistics are designed
interchangeably with the customer requirements often expected to influence the
design of the upstream statistics.
In designing the “farm” to the “fork”
supply chain, the point of focus would be the customer need on the quality of
pork needed. Other considerations include the price consideration as well as
the requirement for freshness. The design therefore ought to consider the speed
of delivery as well as requirements for quality check. In this regard, a
stringent prequalification process should be instituted to ensure that only
reliable suppliers are sourced from. This would help in guaranteeing continuous
production and reducing the risk of contamination of products. To ensure that
there is accountability in the supply chain; identification technology can be
used to track down sources of raw pork to ensure that contravening farmers and
suppliers are easily identified. This would also lessen the need for extra
investment in testing as suppliers will be motivated to avoid unethical conduct
in view of the ease with which they can be identified.
Other specific elements of the supply
chain for the “farm” to the “fork” scenario are as tabulated below:
Supply Chain
Management goal
|
SCM design approaches
|
Keeping
operation costs low
|
Creating
a sourcing platform through prequalification where price is one of the main
factors to consider. The suppliers can also be bound into contracts
stipulating price ranges to insulate the company from price fluctuations.
|
Keeping
quality high
|
Exploit
product identification technology that can track down suppliers from the
product.
Conducting
regular quality checks on supplies delivered.
Including
harsh penalties in supplier contracts for quality breaches to ensure that
quality specifications are upheld
|
Timely
delivery to customers
|
This
is a consequence of growing liking for online shopping. Efforts should be
made to collate orders from the same location to minimise delivery costs.
Coordination with other stores can also be done to have the stores nearest
the customers make the delivery.
|
In the end, a good supply chain
management system should ensure that costs are minimised, quality maximised,
and a sustainable approach to monitoring and adapting to changing market
characteristics put in place.
Agus,
A. & Hajinoor, M.S. (2012). Lean production supply chain management as
driver towards enhancing product quality and business performance: Case study
of manufacturing companies in Malaysia, International
Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 29(1): 92 – 121
Anonymous,
(2013). Horse meat scandal exposes long food supply chain. News for You 61(10): 1
Arif,
K.K. & Pillania, R.K. (2008). Strategic sourcing for supply chain agility
and firms' performance: A study of Indian manufacturing sector. Management Decision 46(16): 1508-1530
Autry,
C.W. (2013). Global macrotrends and their
impact on supply chain management: strategies for gaining competitive.
Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: FT Press
Ayers,
J. (2006). Handbook of Supply Chain Management. Boca Raton, New York: Auerbach
Publications.
Butler,
S. (2013). Analysis: Horse meat scandal
delivers supply chain lessons. Retrieved December 22, 2013 from:
http://www.retail-week.com/analysis-horse-meat-scandal-delivers-supply-chain-lessons/5046419.article
Chan,
F.T.S. & Qi, H.J. (2003). An innovative performance measurement method for
supply chain management. Supply Chain
Management 8(3/4): 209-223
Davarzani,
H., Zegordi, S.H. & Norrman, A.S.I. (2011). Contingent management of supply
chain disruption: Effects of dual or triple sourcing. Transaction E, Industrial Engineering 18(6): 1517-1528
Dey,
A., LaGuardia, P., & Srinivasan, M. (2011). Building sustainability in
logistics operations: a research agenda. Management
Research Review, 34(11): 1237-1259
Fearne,
A., Martinex, M.G. & Dent, B. (2013). Dimensions of sustainable value
chains: implications for value chain analysis., Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(6): 575 – 581
Grant,
D.B. (2013). Sustainable Logistics and
Supply Chain Management. London Kogan Page
Harry,
M. & Schroeder, R. (2000). Six sigma : the breakthrough management
strategy revolutionizing the world's top corporations. New York: Currency.
Harry,
M., Mann, P., Hodgins, O., Hulbert, R. & Lacke, C. (2011). Practitioner's
Guide to Statistics and Lean Six Sigma for Process Improvements. Hoboken:
John Wiley & Sons.
Huang,
X. Gattiker, T.F. & Schroeder, R.G. (2008). Structure-Infrastructure
Alignment: The Relationship Between Tqm Orientation And The Adoption Of
Supplier-Facing Electronic Commerce Among Manufacturers. Journal of Supply Chain Management 44(1): 40-54
Juran,
J. (1995). A history of managing for quality: the evolution, trends, and
future directions of managing for quality. Milwaukee, Wis: ASQC Quality
Press
Keller,
P. (2011). Six sigma demystified. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kurbel,
K.E. (2013). Enterprise Resource Planning
and Supply Chain Management: Functions, Business. Berlin, Heidelberg:
Imprint: Springer
Lin,
L. & Li, T. (2010). An integrated framework for supply chain performance
measurement using six-sigma metrics. Software
Quality Journal 18(3): 387-406
Mistry,
J.J. (2005). Supply Chain Management: A Case Study of an Integrated Lean and
Agile Model. Qualitative Research in
Accounting and Management 2(2): 193-215
Novak,
S. (2001). Sourcing by design: Product complexity and the supply chain. Management Science 47(1): 189-204
Ord,
M. (2013). Horse-meat scandal: Quality
& Risk lessons (News Round-up). Retrieved December 22, 2013 from:
http://compliance.eqms.co.uk/blog/bid/265234/Horse-meat-scandal-Quality-Risk-lessons-News-Round-up
Pfeifer,
T. (2002). Quality management : strategies, methods, techniques ; with 3
tables. München Wien: Hanser
Prater,
E. (2013). An introduction to supply
chain management : a global supply chain support perspective. New York,
N.Y. : Business Expert Press
Ritchie,
B. & Brindley, C. (2007). An emergent framework for supply chain risk
management and performance measurement. The
Journal of the Operational Research Society, suppl. Risk Based Methods for
Supply Chain Planning and Management 58(11): 1398-1411
Smith,
D. & Sparks, L. (2009). Part 3. Food
logistics - Chapter 7. Tesco's supply chain management. London: Kogan Page
Ltd
Svensson,
G. (2010). Teleological approaches in supply chain management: illustrations. Supply Chain Management 15(1): 16-20
Tan,
D. (2013). Lessons For Asia From The
Horse Meat Scandal. Retrieved December 22, 2013 from: http://www.asianscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/kalins-pdf/singles/lessons-asia-horse-meat-scandal-2013.pdf
Thakkar,
J., Kanda, A. & Deshmukh, S.G. (2009). Supply chain performance measurement
framework for small and medium scale enterprises. Benchmarking 16(5): 702-723
Vanichchinchai,
A. & Igel, B. (2009). Total quality management and supply chain management:
similarities and differences. TQM Journal
21(3): 249-260
Webber,
L. & Wallace, M. (2007). Quality control for dummies.
Indianapolis, IN: Wiley Pub
Wee,
H.M. & Wu, S. (2009). Lean supply chain and its effect on product cost and
quality: a case study on Ford Motor Company. Supply Chain Management 14(5): 335-341
Wilding,
R. (1998). The supply chain complexity triangle: Uncertainty generation in the
supply chain. International Journal of
Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 28(8): 599-616
I'm Абрам Александр a businessman who was able to revive his dying lumbering business through the help of a God sent lender known as Benjamin Lee the Loan Consultant. Am resident at Yekaterinburg Екатеринбург. Well are you trying to start a business, settle your debt, expand your existing one, need money to purchase supplies. Have you been having problems trying to secure a Good Credit Facility, I want you to know that Mr Benjamin will see you through. Is this the right place for you to resolve all your financial problems because I am a living testimony and i can't just keep this to myself when others are looking for a way to be financially lifted.. I want you all to contact this God sent lender using the details as stated in order to be a partaker of this great opportunity Email: 247officedept@gmail.com Or WhatsApp/Text +1-989-394-3740.
ReplyDelete