Globalisation Context
•
We are interested in these things because of:
•
Impact
of Globalisation
•
Growth
of international operations of MNEs and the number of countries they operate in
•
MNE
approaches to local cultures
Michael Hopkins ‘Corporate Social Responsibility Around the World’.
•
‘The
notion of corporate social responsibility differs from country to
country’.
•
‘….local
cultures affect how consumers expect companies to behave as does the response
and type of product that a company will sell in a given country’.
•
‘In
a similar way, the interpretation of social responsibility differs from
country to country’
Corporate Social Responsibility Around the World http://www.stthom.edu/Public/getFile.asp?isDownload=1&File_Content_ID=497
(Journal of Online Ethics, Vol. 2, No.2, Oct., 1997)
(Journal of Online Ethics, Vol. 2, No.2, Oct., 1997)
Blowfield M & Murray A – Corporate Responsibility – a
critical introduction, OUP, 2008, p71
•
“Corporate responsibility has … become an important means for
addressing what Stiglitz (2002) sees as the fundamental problem with
contemporary globalization – a system of global governance without global
government”
Profits and Poverty
•
Prahalad (2005) refers to “the fortune at the
bottom of the pyramid”
•
GE – Financial Services for poorer consumers
•
Citigroup adopt microfinance model pioneered by
NGOs and aid agencies in Bangladesh to finance small entrepreneurs
Blowfield M & Murray A (2008) p79
•
Global competition made US and Australian
politicians abandon multilateral environmental agreements like the Kyoto
Protocol
•
But globalisation gives us rapid access to film
of rainforest clearance, tsunamis etc all of which influence how we think about
our interconnectedness on the planet
2. MNE action
•
Against that context the scale and scope of MNE
activity is enormous
MNE RESPONSES
•
3
categories:
–
Adopt
standards of the host country
–
Adopt
standards of the home country
–
Find
a middle way
CULTURAL IMPERIALISM
•
“Herbert Schiller in his 1976 work "Communication
and Cultural Domination" proposed the use of the term "cultural
imperialism" to describe and explain the way in which large multinational
corporations, including the media, of developed countries dominated developing
countries.” http://www.tbsjournal.com/Archives/Spring01/white.html
•
‘There
is our way and the wrong way’.
•
Do
not change business practice to suit the changing environment.
•
Sometimes
termed “universalism” – see Carroll 2004 in Academy of Management Executive
CULTURAL RELATIVISM
•
Morality
varies culture to culture, country to country.
•
Business
practices defined as right or wrong in terms of the particular culture.
•
‘When
in Rome do as the Romans do’.
Puffer & McCarthy(1995)
ethically acceptable behaviour
Rachels J (1998) “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism from his book The Elements of Moral Philosophy, McGraw Hill
•
Callatians eat their dead whereas Greeks believe
it wrong
•
Eskimos see no wrong in infanticide whereas
Americans believe it is immoral
•
Rachels warns that cultural relativism
encourages us to conclude from these 2 statements that these practices are
neither objectively right or wrong, and that opinions differ from culture to
culture
•
He says cultural relativism wouldn’t allow us to
criticise an anti-Semitic or an Apartheid society or one which allowed slavery
•
Iraq under Saddam Hussein?
•
Zimbabwe under Robert Mugabe?
•
He suggests some universal values: care for the
young, importance of telling the truth and prohibition of murder
•
Don’t assume that because customs differ that
there is fundamental disagreement about values
•
Eskimo values may not be that different - but
the harshness of their life forces upon them choices which we don’t have to
make
Rachels, however, notes 2 benefits of cultural relativism
•
It warns us “about the danger of assuming that
all our preferences are based upon some absolute rational standard….” He notes
that many of are practices are peculiar to our society
•
It is always good to keep an open mind
So how does this translate into strategic options for MNEs?
Galbreath J (2006) CSR strategy: strategic options, global considerations, Corporate Governance Vol 6 No 2 pp175-187
•
First pick a base strategy for “home” country:
•
1 – Shareholder Strategy based on Friedman
(1970)- economic responsibilities only
•
2 – Altruistic Strategy – giving back in the
form of money for good causes
•
3 – Reciprocal Strategy – more strategic
approach to CSR – happy to improve societal benefits but also benefits for the
Co
•
4 – Citizenship Strategy – identifies and
dialogues with stakeholders as part of general strategy formulation
•
Suggests further 4 issues to take into account:
•
Culture – different values espoused by
different cultures – will the “base strategy” adopted (see previous slide)
adapt to international strategy – may need mixture
•
Regulatory Environment – do you adopt a
universal approach to compensate for deficiencies in local laws?
•
NGO impact in different countries needs
to be taken account of
•
Global standards – over 400 to choose
from – form external benchmarks
The Motivation of MNEs
•
MNEs
aim to make profits
•
Basis
of profit lies overseas – either resources eg mining or market seeking
•
Take
advantage of : lower costs in terms of set-up; labour; raw materials etc. Outsourcing
a popular strategy in recent years
Abuses of MNE Power
•
MNEs
can wield considerable power in some economies
•
Certain
crises have raised international concern over the ethical conduct of MNE’s in
host and other countries :
•
Union Carbide
: Bhopal : India -’alarmed other nations over questionable safety standards and
controls of MNE foreign operations’.
•
Nestle :
powdered instant milk formula -’raised questions about the lack of proper
product instructions issued to indigent, less-educated consumers’.
•
Presence
of MNEs in South Africa ‘raised criticisms over the role of large corporations
in actively supporting apartheid or government-supported racism. Because MNEs
have to pay taxes to the South African government, and because apartheid is a
government-supported policy, MNEs - it is argued - support racism’.
•
Long-term
moral issue :’the practice of MNEs not paying their fair share of taxes in
countries where they do business and in their home countries’.
WHERE DOES THE FAULT LIE?
•
MNEs
?
•
Host
Governments?
–
Current
ethical consumer and ethical investor movements may put pressure on the MNEs
–
Host
Governments need the political will to change – but it is arguable that the
sheer scale of some MNEs make them hard for small or poor countries to resist.
MNEs As Agents of Change
•
Capital
investment
•
Facilitate
less-developed countries to access international markets.
•
Employment
•
Infrastructure
development
•
Education
and training etc.
CRITICISMS OF MNEs
•
Financial
power to control economic, social and political nature of a country.
•
Pay
low wages compared to home.
•
Buy
raw materials cheaply.
•
Build
and operate cheaply and below international standards.
•
MNEs
protect technology so that host remains consumer.
•
MNEs
destabilise national sovereignty by limiting host’s access to local capital and
resources.
•
MNEs
set up brain drain.
•
MNEs
create import/export imbalance
•
MNEs
disturb local government economic planning eg. by paying above average wages.
•
MNEs
destroy and pollute environment.
Faced With Complications
•
Host
countries can :
–
limit
the return on MNE assets and earnings.
–
require
that MNE’s use local parts and materials.
–
require
a percentage of profit to be re-invested in host country.
No comments:
Post a Comment