Definitions
Multinational
corporation
¡ Companies
producing or distributing goods or
services in two or more countries
Transnational
corporation
¡ A
multinational with more than 2/3rds of its activities outside its home country
Why?
¡ Cost
¡ Complexity
Cost
Tax
advantages
¡ For
example, Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation controlled by holding companies in
the notorious tax haven the Cayman Islands – pays an average tax of 10%
Labour
costs
¡ Low
wage industries such as textiles
¡ High
tech jet-airline industries
Centralisation
¡ Flower
industry concentrated in the Netherlands as a result of lower air transport
costs
Complexity
Domestic
organisation
¡ Serves
home market only
International
organisation
¡ Serves
home and overseas market. Has centralised headquarters in country of origin
Multinational
organisation
¡ Produces
goods or services in relatively autonomous overseas subsidiaries.
Global
organisation
¡ Operates
worldwide through independent overseas divisions which are coordinated rather
than controlled by headquarters
Transnational
organisations
International, multinational and global. Specialised unites
located anywhere in the world ‘seamless network of footloose managers with a
global mindset’
Background Issues
Single
Markets (EU, NAFTA)
Political
Revolutions (Eastern Europe, Latin America)
Market
Liberalization (WTO, IMF)
Multi-national
companies include large household names such as McDonalds, Shell, Toyota etc.
and much smaller companies
In
2001: 63,000 TNC with 800,000 foreign affiliates. Responsible for 2/3rds of
global trade and 80% of investment
United
Nations Development Programme (2000) demonstrated that largest MNCs have annual
sales greater than many medium sized countries
i.e.
Shell is twice the size of Nigeria
Of
the largest 100 economic actors in the world, 51 are corporations, 49 are
countries (Pilger, 2000)
In
the past FDI generally flowed from West to developing economies
Now,
more MNCs owned and controlled by non-Western sources – implications for IHRM
However
Of
the top 100 non-financial TNCs, 91 in US, EU or Japan
Of
the 2006 Fortune Global
¡ 172
based in the EU
¡ 114
based in the US
¡ 70
based in Japan
¡ 20
based in china
Structures and Relationships
The
relationship between centre and subsidiaries, and between multi-national and nation
¡ Ethnocentric:
favours home country effects
¡ Polycentric:
favours host country effects
¡ Geocentric:
global approach
¡ Regiocentric:
regional structures
Issues
Constant
tension between centralisation and decentralisation
Linked
to national, regional and global context
Business
environment, economic, social, political factors
Occur
at national, regional and global levels
Issues
of legislation, trade agreements etc.
Convergence
and divergence
HRM in Mergers and Acquisitions
A
full joining together of two previously separate corporations.
A
true merger in the legal sense occurs when both businesses dissolve and fold
their assets and liabilities into a newly created third entity.
This
entails the creation of a new corporation.
Example:
•
Total merging with Fina and Elf
An
acquisition is where one organisation continues to operate under its original
brand name, but has a new brand at parent level.
This
might not necessarily change who people work for in either business, although
some parent organisations choose to say that the whole workforce is employed by
them.
Example:
•
France Telecom’s acquisition of Orange
An
acquisition where the acquired organisation loses its former brand to operate
under the brand of the acquirer.
This
means that the acquired employees will have a new employer after the
acquisition while the acquiring employees will not.
Examples:
•
RHM being incorporated into Premier Foods
•
Stanley Leisure being incorporated into William Hill
Divestment
A
part of an organisation becomes a stand-alone business.
This
means that employees will have a new employer after the divestment.
Example:
•
British Telecom spun off their mobile division MMO2 for it to trade as a
separate business O2
More
than 50% of M&As are unsuccessful (KPMG 1999)
Inability
to integrate culturally is more important than financial or strategic factors (Booz
Allen and Hamilton in Cartwright and
Cooper, 1996: 28)
61% of top managers believe cross border M&A
to be riskier than domestic (Angwin & Savill, 1997)
Cultural
distance hypothesis: Difficulties, costs, risks
increase with growing cultural differences.
But
evidence is not clear cut: Cultural differences in M&As can be an asset
rather than a liability
The Process
Scoping
and due diligence
¡ initial
merger or acquisition talks between both businesses; hiring third party
adviser; a few selected senior managers are aware of the initial talks; due
diligence is being conducted; deal is finalised; integration programme office
is set up and integration resources are identified.
Integration
Planning
¡ extended
management and individuals needed for the integration programme and work
streams are involved; integration kick-off and work streams kicked off;
planning and communication; operational integration achieved.
Short-term
integration
¡ integration
programme office likely to be closed down; third party advisers likely to
leave; focus on meeting operational integration milestones and deliverables;
for some, back to ‘business as usual’; for others, focus is still on
integration of people processes and systems.
Long-tem
integration
¡ shared
learning from the programme (gone well/not gone well); majority of the business
being back to ‘business as usual’ due to many integration milestones being
achieved; ongoing measurement of achievements and return on investment; some
still focusing on integration of people processes and systems.
Employees
• A
list of employees including positions
• CVs
of key employees
• Current
salaries, salaries and bonuses stock option and stock purchase and retirement
plans. A list and description of benefits
• All
employment contracts between the Company and any of its employees
• The
Company's personnel handbook
• Copies
of collective bargaining agreements
• A
description of all employee problems within the last three years and any labour
disputes
• A
description of worker's compensation claim history
• A
description of unemployment insurance claims history
HR Issues
Human
resource planning
¡ i.e.
McKinsey survey suggests that 76% of firms see retention of key talent as a
major issue. 67% see executive retention as key
¡ Probability
of executives leaving following acquisition by a foreign multi-national is 75%
by fifth year. The majority leave in the first two years
¡ Talent
maps
¡ Inducements
to stay i.e. stock options, retention bonuses
Communication
¡ Rumour
¡ Role
of HRM
Ethical Considerations
Downsizing
Accountability
Universal
standards versus variability
¡ For
example, remuneration, benefits, training and development
Legal
frameworks
Hostile
takeovers
Conclusion
Practicing
and merging HRM across borders is complex and prone to breakdown
The
early integration of HRM versus secrecy
Companies
need to ensure they retain talent, manage the process well. For example,
downsizing.
Ethical
issues need to be considered.
No comments:
Post a Comment