Definitions
— Multinational
corporation
¡ Companies
producing or distributing goods or
services in two or more countries
— Transnational
corporation
¡ A
multinational with more than 2/3rds of its activities outside its home country
— Why?
¡ Cost
¡ Complexity
Cost
— Tax
advantages
¡ For
example, Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation controlled by holding companies in
the notorious tax haven the Cayman Islands – pays an average tax of 10%
— Labour
costs
¡ Low
wage industries such as textiles
¡ High
tech jet-airline industries
— Centralisation
¡ Flower
industry concentrated in the Netherlands as a result of lower air transport
costs
Complexity
— Domestic
organisation
¡ Serves
home market only
— International
organisation
¡ Serves
home and overseas market. Has centralised headquarters in country of origin
— Multinational
organisation
¡ Produces
goods or services in relatively autonomous overseas subsidiaries.
— Global
organisation
¡ Operates
worldwide through independent overseas divisions which are coordinated rather
than controlled by headquarters
— Transnational
organisations
International, multinational and global. Specialised unites
located anywhere in the world ‘seamless network of footloose managers with a
global mindset’
Background Issues
— Single
Markets (EU, NAFTA)
— Political
Revolutions (Eastern Europe, Latin America)
— Market
Liberalization (WTO, IMF)
— Multi-national
companies include large household names such as McDonalds, Shell, Toyota etc.
and much smaller companies
— In
2001: 63,000 TNC with 800,000 foreign affiliates. Responsible for 2/3rds of
global trade and 80% of investment
— United
Nations Development Programme (2000) demonstrated that largest MNCs have annual
sales greater than many medium sized countries
— i.e.
Shell is twice the size of Nigeria
— Of
the largest 100 economic actors in the world, 51 are corporations, 49 are
countries (Pilger, 2000)
— In
the past FDI generally flowed from West to developing economies
— Now,
more MNCs owned and controlled by non-Western sources – implications for IHRM
However
— Of
the top 100 non-financial TNCs, 91 in US, EU or Japan
— Of
the 2006 Fortune Global
¡ 172
based in the EU
¡ 114
based in the US
¡ 70
based in Japan
¡ 20
based in china
Structures and Relationships
— The
relationship between centre and subsidiaries, and between multi-national and nation
¡ Ethnocentric:
favours home country effects
¡ Polycentric:
favours host country effects
¡ Geocentric:
global approach
¡ Regiocentric:
regional structures
Issues
— Constant
tension between centralisation and decentralisation
— Linked
to national, regional and global context
— Business
environment, economic, social, political factors
— Occur
at national, regional and global levels
— Issues
of legislation, trade agreements etc.
— Convergence
and divergence
HRM in Mergers and Acquisitions
— A
full joining together of two previously separate corporations.
— A
true merger in the legal sense occurs when both businesses dissolve and fold
their assets and liabilities into a newly created third entity.
— This
entails the creation of a new corporation.
— Example:
— •
Total merging with Fina and Elf
— An
acquisition is where one organisation continues to operate under its original
brand name, but has a new brand at parent level.
— This
might not necessarily change who people work for in either business, although
some parent organisations choose to say that the whole workforce is employed by
them.
— Example:
— •
France Telecom’s acquisition of Orange
— An
acquisition where the acquired organisation loses its former brand to operate
under the brand of the acquirer.
— This
means that the acquired employees will have a new employer after the
acquisition while the acquiring employees will not.
— Examples:
— •
RHM being incorporated into Premier Foods
— •
Stanley Leisure being incorporated into William Hill
Divestment
— A
part of an organisation becomes a stand-alone business.
— This
means that employees will have a new employer after the divestment.
— Example:
— •
British Telecom spun off their mobile division MMO2 for it to trade as a
separate business O2
— More
than 50% of M&As are unsuccessful (KPMG 1999)
— Inability
to integrate culturally is more important than financial or strategic factors (Booz
Allen and Hamilton in Cartwright and
Cooper, 1996: 28)
— 61% of top managers believe cross border M&A
to be riskier than domestic (Angwin & Savill, 1997)
— Cultural
distance hypothesis: Difficulties, costs, risks
increase with growing cultural differences.
— But
evidence is not clear cut: Cultural differences in M&As can be an asset
rather than a liability
The Process
— Scoping
and due diligence
¡ initial
merger or acquisition talks between both businesses; hiring third party
adviser; a few selected senior managers are aware of the initial talks; due
diligence is being conducted; deal is finalised; integration programme office
is set up and integration resources are identified.
— Integration
Planning
¡ extended
management and individuals needed for the integration programme and work
streams are involved; integration kick-off and work streams kicked off;
planning and communication; operational integration achieved.
— Short-term
integration
¡ integration
programme office likely to be closed down; third party advisers likely to
leave; focus on meeting operational integration milestones and deliverables;
for some, back to ‘business as usual’; for others, focus is still on
integration of people processes and systems.
— Long-tem
integration
¡ shared
learning from the programme (gone well/not gone well); majority of the business
being back to ‘business as usual’ due to many integration milestones being
achieved; ongoing measurement of achievements and return on investment; some
still focusing on integration of people processes and systems.
Employees
• A
list of employees including positions
• CVs
of key employees
• Current
salaries, salaries and bonuses stock option and stock purchase and retirement
plans. A list and description of benefits
• All
employment contracts between the Company and any of its employees
• The
Company's personnel handbook
• Copies
of collective bargaining agreements
• A
description of all employee problems within the last three years and any labour
disputes
• A
description of worker's compensation claim history
• A
description of unemployment insurance claims history
HR Issues
— Human
resource planning
¡ i.e.
McKinsey survey suggests that 76% of firms see retention of key talent as a
major issue. 67% see executive retention as key
¡ Probability
of executives leaving following acquisition by a foreign multi-national is 75%
by fifth year. The majority leave in the first two years
¡ Talent
maps
¡ Inducements
to stay i.e. stock options, retention bonuses
— Communication
¡ Rumour
¡ Role
of HRM
Ethical Considerations
— Downsizing
— Accountability
— Universal
standards versus variability
¡ For
example, remuneration, benefits, training and development
— Legal
frameworks
— Hostile
takeovers
Conclusion
— Practicing
and merging HRM across borders is complex and prone to breakdown
— The
early integration of HRM versus secrecy
— Companies
need to ensure they retain talent, manage the process well. For example,
downsizing.
— Ethical
issues need to be considered.
No comments:
Post a Comment