What
does it mean for a business to be ethical?
In business, ethics is about doing
things right where the interests of all stakeholders are respected and upheld
as much as possible. This has implications on the type of operations to be
undertaken, how the organisation treats employees, and even the amount of money
the business can make at a time. The concept of ethics is widespread and is
seen from a cultural perspective in different cultures including Jeintinho in Brazil, Blat in Russia, Jugaad in India, and Guanxi in
China (Berger and Herstein, 2014, p.779). These different cultural
interpretations have a common factor in the emphasis on upholding trust and
conducting business in a manner that upholds the rights and interests of other
parties. Since businesses are mainly established to maximise wealth by making
profits, emphasis on ethics leads to the question of how important ethics are
to business organisations and whether it is prudent for organisations to invest
in them. This essay argues that even though ethics may come at a cost to the
organisation, ethics can lead to businesses benefiting from stronger
relationships with partners, employees, and consumers.
An organisation is ethical when it
consciously makes decisions that can be said to uphold the interest of all
stakeholders with a view to upholding what is practical, sensible, and
acceptable (Archidvili et al. 2015,
p. 417). This conscious effort ought to be in writing and enshrined in its
corporate values to provide guidance on the decisions employees make from time
to time. This means that whenever the organisation is faced with a choice,
they’d deliberately choose the decision which is most effective in upholding
their ethical values. The consistency with which an organisation makes
ethically acceptable decisions is what determines whether or not it can be said
to be ethical. It’s, however, difficult to make straight judgements on whether
a business is ethical based on decisions made. This is because some ethical
dilemmas are two-faced and a decision can be made in favour or either side with
sound ethical considerations in mind. An example of an ethical dilemma is the
question of international recruitment as discussed by Young (2013). Young
explores two main ethical dimensions pitting the interest of two categories of
people against each other. On one hand are the professionals in the developing
countries intending to seek for jobs in the UK while on the other is the health
professional who is a citizen of the UK (Young, 2013, p. 189).
The question that can be addressed is:
is it ethical to deny an immigrant professional a job opportunity because of
the need to keep the citizens employed (Young, 2013)? This is an ethical
question that could be answered in either way depending on the values of the
organisation. For instance, an organisation focusing largely on the local
population would consider it ethical or part of its responsibility to the local
community to employ locally and avoid employing immigrants. This could come at
a cost to the organisation since professionals from developing countries would
often charge lower fees. On the other hand, an organisation which prioritises
the rights of the immigrant to an opportunity can similarly be seen to be
ethical as they’d be upholding the right of a person to equal treatment. Such
an ethical dilemma can be resolved by finding in favour of the local employee
or the immigrant and the organisation cannot be said to be unethical depending
on the decision taken. But in many scenarios, it is possible for one to gauge
whether an organisation is ethical or not.
In the process of ethical decision
making, the ethical organisation is expected to come up with sets of values
that guide individuals in their routine decision making. Ismail (2015, p. 148)
makes a distinction between individual and organisational decision making where
the distinction is dependent on the ability of the organisation to create a set
of universal values. The organisation must understand that its employees are
drawn from multiple backgrounds. They are therefore unlikely to agree on many
ethical questions depending on their respective personal and cultural backgrounds.
This is why it is important for the organisation to have a value system. The
ethical decisions made should be in line with the value system. Ismail (2015,
p. 147) address the factors that affect ethical decision making among auditors
in Malaysia. They establish that personal factors such as emotional
intelligence are as influential as organisational factors in determining the
ethical decisions made by the auditors. The implication is that for an
organisation to be ethical; there must be a set of common values guiding all
business decisions.
Being able to align ethics into all
organisational systems and processes is also an important characteristic of the
ethical organisation. An important area in which this could be manifested is
the area of human resource management HRM. Greenwood (2013, p. 361) recommends
that all HRM systems and processes be reviewed to ensure that they uphold the
ethical values of the organisation. The employees should be granted working
conditions that are acceptable and also policies crafted with their welfare in
mind. Issues of procedural justice and fairness in promotion and reward should
also be focused on with a view to ensuring that no unethical practices are
tolerated. This also applies to the fairness in recruitment processes. This is
in addition to conducting regular research studies to identify emerging areas
of concern for the employees.
Organisations should be able to uphold
ethics even if it comes at a cost to their profitability. Ethics in business
will in most cases require that the decisions made are in the best interest of
all parties; even when it translates into fewer profits for the organisation. A
good example can be drawn from Peifer (2014, p. 636) where the conduct of
mutual funds is discussed. One of the means used to uphold ethics is screening
where the mutual fund managers decide to rule out investing in activities or
funds that are deemed to engage in unethical business. This means that the
mutual funds would be contributing to promoting good ethics in the market in
addition to upholding good ethics themselves. The other approach is advocating
for the upholding of shareholder rights by using their numbers to lobby for a
favourable position (Peifer, 2014, p. 636). This helps to protect minority
shareholders and this is seen as evidence of commitment to good ethics. A
commitment to these ethical standards may mean loss of business opportunities,
especially where a potentially lucrative investment is avoided because it is
deemed to be unethical. This leads to the question on whether good ethics are
good for business.
Berger and Herstein (2014, p.781) seem
to endorse ethical business as likely to be competitive due the level of
confidence it attracts among business partners. The viability of a business is
dependent on its ability to attract and sustain meaningful partnerships. When a
business is committed to good ethics, it improves the level of certainty and
reliability more effectively than where legally binding contracts are used.
This is the view of Berger and Herstein (2014, p.781) where they make a
comparison between the Chinese and the Western business culture. In their
observation, the Western business environment is backed by strong legal
structures. These make it easy to monitor performance and enforce contracts. On
the other hand, the Chinese business environment has weaker legal structures
forcing businesses to resort to social means of controlling transactions and
conduct of businesses. This compels prospective business partners to look into
the ethical record of the organisation before choosing to work with it. The
implication is that a good record in ethics is an investment.
Another benefit that ethical businesses
can expect to gain is enhanced loyalty of their customers. Peifer (2014, p.
647) conducted an empirical study to compare the commitment to ethics and the
level of customer loyalty. He established that mutual funds which were keen on
positive screening to invest only in ethical activities tended to attract
higher levels of customer loyalty. The implication is that customers form
positive perceptions about the organisations that conduct their business
positively. This translates into them being loyal to the organisation and it
comes with benefits such as sustained revenues and positive word of mouth
marketing. This view is consistent with that of Belghitar et al. (2014, p. 61) where they establish that even though
financial benefits of ethical behaviour cannot be determined decisively, there
are many non-financial benefits the organisation stands to gain. This finding
is also reiterated by Kim et al. (2014,
p. 124) who also link loyalty in the finance sector to the perceived ethical
standing of the organisation.
In conclusion, the ethical organisation
is one that upholds positive business values in all its activities, systems,
and decisions. This may at times involve making sacrifices and letting go of
various opportunities that may be profitable to the organisation. But as the
discussions above have demonstrated, the direct cost made by the ethical
organisation tends to attract various benefits including the loyalty of
customers. These benefits have the net impact of improving the competitiveness
of the organisation.
References
Ardichvili, A., Jondle, D., Kowske, B., Cornachione,
E., Li, J. and Thakadipuram, T. (2012) Ethical Cultures in Large Business
Organizations in Brazil, Russia, India, and China, Journal of Business Ethics, 105(4), 415-428
Belghitar, Y., Clark, E. and Deshmukh, N. (2014)
Does it pay to be ethical? Evidence from the FTSE4Good, Journal of Banking & Finance, 47, 54-67
Berger, R. and Herstein, R. (2014) The evolution of
Chinese business ethics, Management
Research Review, 37(9), 790-778
Greenwood, M. (2013) Ethical Analyses of HRM: A
Review and Research Agenda, Journal of
Business Ethics, 114(2), 355-366
Ismail, S. (2015) Influence of emotional
intelligence, ethical climates, and corporate ethical values on ethical
judgment of Malaysian auditors, Asian
Journal of Business Ethics, 4(2), 147-162
Kim, M., Surroca, J. and Tribó, J.A. (2014) Impact
of ethical behavior on syndicated loan rates, Journal of Banking and Finance, 38, 122-144
Peifer, J. (2014) Fund Loyalty Among Socially
Responsible Investors: The Importance of the Economic and Ethical Domains, Journal of Business Ethics, 121(4),
635-649
Young, R. (2013) How effective is an ethical
international recruitment policy? Reflections on a decade of experience in
England, Health policy, 111(2),
184-192
No comments:
Post a Comment